Trapping

Trapping of wild birds in 2019

Despite trapping being non-conformant to the Birds Directive, as it is considered an unsustainable method of killing wild birds, Malta still allows a trapping season each and every autumn, by means of a derogation.

The trapping season during 2019 is being permitted as from the 20th of October 2019 until the 10th of January 2020, on two species – Song Thrush and Golden Plover with a number of changes:

  1. Despite being allowed to trap Song Thrush between the 20th October and 31st December, and Golden Plover between the 1st November and the 10th January – the Maltese Government has effectively permitted the trapping season to increase by 10 days into January 2020.
  2. Where previously nets of a mesh size not smaller than 45mm by 45mm were allowed for trapping sites, this year trapping for Song Thrush can be done using a net with a minimum mesh size of 35mm by 35mm.
  3. Trappers are obliged to distinguish birds trapped this season by fitting them with single-use rings provided by the Wild Birds Regulation Unit.

According to WBRU, for the 2019 trapping season, a total of 1,587 applicants have been granted a licence to trap wild birds, operating no less than a total of 1,895 trapping sites across Malta and Gozo. The main rationale why trappers are allowed to catch such birds, is to be able to use them as live decoys for hunting or further trapping.

Song Thrush

 

Golden Plover

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Infringement procedures

The current trapping season for Song Thrush and Golden Plover is the subject of infringement proceedings initiated by the European Commission in 2011.  The two warnings already given to the Maltese Government concerned the manner past trapping seasons were opened, and not adequately enforced.

This means that should the next trapping season be considered as being unjustified, inadequately enforced or in breach of the principles of the Birds’ Directive, the European Commission may decide to take Malta once again to the European Court of Justice.

This would be the second case against Malta on trapping, following June 2018’s landmark European Court of Justice (ECJ) judgement which found Malta guilty of infringing the European Birds Directive when it allowed finch trapping to reopen between 2014 and 2017.

The ECJ finch trapping verdict sent an indirect message to the Government to also halt the trapping season for Golden Plover and Song Thrush since the methods applied in this case are the same as those applied to capture finches.

What is permitted?

The trapping season is now open.

With over 1,895 trapping sites active between October 2019 and January 2020, it is likely to encounter trapping activity in the countryside across Malta and Gozo.

Which birds can be trapped?

– Song Thrush (Malvizz)
– Golden Plover (Pluviera)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

National quotas are set at 5,000 Song Thrush and 700 Golden Plover. There are no individual bag limit for trapping of both species. All other birds cannot be trapped.

Where is trapping allowed?

Nets for trapping can only be used at sites authorized and licenced by the Wild Birds Regulation Unit.

Clap nets laid down at a trapping site

A total of 1,895 trapping sites have been authorized to trap this year. The locations of permitted trapping sites in 2019 can be seen in this google map:

Trapping should not be authorized on protected habitats, but unfortunately may be authorized on public land or land belonging to third parties, as long as this has been registered with WBRU.

When is trapping allowed?

20th October – 31st October: only Song Thrush can be trapped
31st October – 31st December: both Song Thrush and Golden Plover can be trapped
1st January – 10th January: only Golden Plover can be trapped

Trapping is permitted during all day without timing or weekend/public holiday restrictions. During the night, trappers are obliged to dismantle their nets or cover them. Nets cannot be left unattended due to their possibility of catching other birds and fauna.

What could constitute illegal trapping?

Unauthorised use of land
If a trapping site is located in an area not authorized by WBRU, then the trapping site is operating illegally irrespective of what species it may be targeting.

Trapping sites that may not be authorised include those on garrigue habitats in coastal Natura 2000 sites

Finch trapping
The practice of finch trapping is still a widespread issue with the majority of trapping sites in 2018 still targeting these species despite the practice being illegal since June 2018.

Finches are normally placed in tiny cages along the borders or within areas where trapping clap nets are placed, and can include any of these species: Linnet, Goldfinch, Greenfinch, Siskin, Hawfinch, Chaffinch and Serin. At times finches may also be tethered and swiveled up and down on a trapping site to attract wild finches.

Finch trapping is generally indicated by the use of small cages containing live birds

A tethered finch tied to a stick is often also used at trapping sites, being swung up and down to attract wild finches

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

All such finches are roughly the size of a sparrow or a canary and therefore they are unmistakable to Song Thrush and Golden Plover which are much larger birds.

Wader trapping
Despite Golden Plover being effectively a wader bird, the sites equipped for Golden Plover trapping are at times equipped to target other birds which cannot be trapped.

These include species like Northern Lapwing and Ruff which can be hunted but cannot be trapped. Seeing such birds in cages as live decoys or as fake decoys on a trapping sites, means that the trapper is targeting such species illegally.

Lapwing decoys cannot be used on trapping sites

Use of bird callers
The use of bird callers is at all times illegal. A bird caller can be distinguished from the call of caged birds by being often repetitive, loud and continuing on for hours, especially at night.

Golden Plover callers often use a mix of calls similar to this:

Report

How to report illegal trapping

Illegal trapping can constitute any of the following scenarios:

a) It is using a location not permitted by WBRU (check here)
b) It is targeting finches or any other birds which are not Song Thrush and Golden Plover
c) It is using bird callers
d) It has been left unattended with nets still out able to catch fauna

In such cases, you can report the matter as follows:

1. Know your location adequately, ideally with a GPS coordinate you can refer to from your smart phone
2. Take photos and videos as necessary of what you think might be illegal – note that in the case of bird callers, audio is crucial
3. Do note what else can be helpful when giving details to police – a landmark, a description of a vehicle, the name of a road etc.,
4. Call police on 119, asking to get in touch with the ALE unit which is closest to your area. Do take note of who is the police officer you are talking to and do provide them with a contact number so they can reach you. Explain clearly what kind of illegal trapping you are witnessing (a-d above)
5. Contact us directly on 21347646 or 7925 5697 (outside office hours) so we may be able to guide you further on reporting the matter. You can also send us photos, videos, maps or location by email to info@birdlifemalta.org.

Trapping is an unsustainable method of hunting which causes damage to wildlife and habitats. Your contribution to reporting the situation in the field will help us protects birds and wildlife. See next section on the impacts of trapping.

Impacts

Trappers prepare their trapping sites by removing vegetation using mechanical cutters, burning or toxic herbicides. In many cases soil, sand or gravel is then dumped on the land to create a level surface on which nets can be laid. This practice scars the land and in fact, trapping sites can easily be seen from the air or satellite images.

A trapping site in Gozo

Many trapping sites are situated in some of the richest areas for biodiversity on the Maltese islands, including Natura 2000 sites.

Many trapping sites are also illegally built in Special Areas of Conservation, where the act of destroying protected habitat is against international law.

The destruction of habitat impacts on other species of flora and fauna, resulting in a loss of biodiversity, further impoverishing our countryside.

Apart from loss of habitat, wildlife is also harmed by nets which are often left unattended on the ground overnight, out of season, or after being abandoned. This exposes animals and birds to the risk of getting entangled in the nets and suffering a slow death of starvation or exposure.

The damage trapping can cause to the environment is one of the reasons trapping is banned in EU member states under the Birds Directive.

Trapping methods

Trapping in Malta is mainly carried out using clap nets.  This method uses two large nets which are placed parallel to each other on the ground and swing shut towards each other when activated. In preparation for the use of clap nets, trappers remove all vegetation in the trapping area and often dump soil or gravel to create a level surface where the nets can be spread. A number of live decoy birds are also placed around the trapping site – either kept in tiny cages or tied directly to the ground by a harness.  This type of trapping site is the one most frequently encountered in the Maltese countryside and is also the only legal form of trapping. Golden Plover and Song Thrush are the only birds that can be caught using this method.

Other illegal methods of trapping include:

Cage traps: Taking the form of a small cage unit to large aviary-like contraptions, the use of cage traps is illegal for any species. Cage traps are distinguished from aviaries or cages by having a space where a bird can enter and is either ensared inside, or literally trapped in without the possibility of exiting.

Large cage traps may be encountered in the countryside particularly targeting Turtle Doves, however smaller sized cage traps can also be encountered targeting finches, or even robins.

In all cases of cage traps, a live bird decoy of the species being targeted is used.

Mist nets: Mist nets are vertical nets suspended on poles which are placed close to vegetation and are used to catch birds which fly into them. The use of such nets is solely permitted for research purposes. Illegal use of mist nets has at times been used in Malta to particularly trap Song Thrush illegally. Their use is often accompanied with the use of live decoys and/or electronic callers.

Crop nets: Another type of net used is a horizontal net spread over a tall crop, such as corn, with three sides dangling to the ground and the fourth tied up like a curtain. This net is used to catch Common Quail, which seek cover in the crops after arriving in Malta at night – they are again attracted to the area by a large number of live decoys or electronic lures. In the morning the net is closed completely and a dog is pushed under the net to flush the trapped quails into a corner where they can be removed by the trapper.

Any other form of catching wild birds, irrespective whether these can be hunted or not, is illegal.

 

Finch trapping

When Malta joined the EU in 2004, a ban on finch trapping was one of the conditions of the Accession Treaty. The government agreed to gradually phase out trapping for finches over a five year period. However, in 2014 the practice was reintroduced.

The finches trapped include Greenfinch, Goldfinch, Hawfinch, Chaffinch, Serin, Linnet and Siskin.

In September 2015, the European Commission announced that they will be taking Malta to the European Court of Justice (ECJ) for allowing finch trapping, against EU law.

The court case was initiated in October 2015 and in July 2017, ECJ Advocate General Eleanor V. E. Sharpston delivered a scathing Opinion denouncing finch trapping in Malta and clearly declaring that Malta had no judicious cause to trap birds whilst questioning the level of enforcement and supervision.

Despite this, however, the Maltese Government in autumn 2017 decided once again to open the trapping season. This was the fourth finch trapping season to be opened (October 2014, October 2015, October 2016 and October 2017) despite the finch trapping derogation having continuously been an issue with the EU since the first steps taken against the country with the Letter of Formal Notice sent by the EU Commission to Malta on October 17th, 2014.

Merely a year after the ECJ Advocate General’s Opinion, in June 2018 the final judgement was delivered. It was heavily based on this Opinion.

The verdict in the case C-557/15 “European Commission vs Republic of Malta” found Malta guilty on four main counts and defeated all arguments presented by the Maltese Government, mainly:

  1. That there are no other satisfactory solutions: To the contrary, the Court ruled that Malta did not even consider any other alternatives before authorising trapping and so failed to show that there was no other satisfactory solution,
  2. That trapping is carried out in small numbers: To the contrary, the Court concluded that the numbers captured in Malta do not constitute a sustainable practice in relation to the birds that migrate over Malta from Europe,
  3. That trapping in Malta falls within the concept of ‘judicious use’ and is selective: To the contrary, the Court noted that, in view that trapping in Malta is done with massive clap-nets, it is non-selective (captures not just finches but also other fauna) and neither does it allow the control of small numbers. In view of this the Court concluded that recreational trapping of birds cannot be considered as ‘judicious use’ of wild birds,
  4. That trapping is carried out under strict enforcement: To the contrary, the Court was not convinced with the enforcement efforts carried out by the Maltese authorities in regard of the control of finches caught and the system adopted by the Wild Birds Regulation Unit (WBRU) to declare their catches. It noted that only 23% of trappers have been subject to individual checks which is inadequate and also added that evidence shows that trapping in Natura 2000 sites has been rather frequent.

Click here for a detailed timeline of the history of finch trapping in Malta.

Below are the seven types of finches which were the subject of court action initiated by the European Commission against Malta at the European Court of Justice (Click on each picture to enlarge).

Siskin (Ekru)

Goldfinch (Gardell)

European Serin (Apparell)

Linnet (Ġojjin)

Greenfinch (Verdun)

Common Chaffinch (Sponsun)

Hawfinch (Taż-Żebbuġ)

ECJ judgement

On 21st June 2018, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) delivered a judgement concluding that Malta was found guilty of infringing the European Birds Directive when it allowed finch trapping to reopen in 2014. The ECJ clearly stated that by adopting a derogation allowing the trapping of seven species of wild finch, Malta has failed to fulfill its obligations under EU law.

BirdLife Malta insisted that in the light of this judgement, the Government should never open the trapping season for finches again and should repeal the relevant framework law with immediate effect. You can read more here.

Delivered by the European Court of Justice as the final stage of the infringement case initiated by the European Commission against Malta in 2015, the verdict follows the Opinion delivered in July 2017 by ECJ Advocate General Eleanor V. E. Sharpston in regard to the same Infringement Proceedings which on 24th September 2015 resulted in Malta being referred to the Court of Justice of the EU.

In preparation for this landmark ECJ judgement, in January 2018 BirdLife Malta had launched the campaign #STOPTRAPPINGNOW with the objective of explaining more about trapping to the general public and raising awareness about the several impacts of finch trapping on the birds, their habitat and the Maltese environment in general.

Click here for the campaign leaflet we prepared to explain more about finch trapping in Malta and the several impacts on the birds, their habitat and the Maltese environment.

Click here for a detailed dossier which contains details about the situation in regard to finch trapping in Malta and how this is damaging to our country, together with a timeline in relation to the European Court of Justice (ECJ) case.

#STOP TRAPPING NOW