The trapping season is now closed.

The 2018 trapping season was open between 20 October and 31 December 2018. During the season, trapping was only permitted for Song Thrush (Malvizz) and Golden Plover (Pluviera) following June’s landmark European Court of Justice (ECJ) judgement which found Malta guilty of infringing the European Birds Directive when it allowed finch trapping to reopen in 2014.

Song Thrush

Golden Plover

The ECJ finch trapping verdict sent an indirect message to the Government to also halt the trapping season for Golden Plover and Song Thrush since the methods applied in this case are the same as those applied to capture finches.

Apart from this, even the Golden Plover and Song Thrush derogation is the subject of infringement proceedings initiated by the European Commission in 2011. Despite this, on 25 July 2018 – barely a month after the judgement of the European Court – the Ornis Committee recommended to government the opening of a trapping season for these two species. On that occasion BirdLife Malta had warned that a trapping season for Golden Plover and Song Thrush, if approved by the Government, will be risking another EU court case against Malta.

However, on 17 October 2018 Parliamentary Secretary Clint Camilleri confirmed that the government would be applying the derogation and opening a trapping season for Song Thrush and Golden Plover as from Saturday 20 October 2018. Around 1,500 trappers registered for the trapping season.


The trapping season is now closed.

Any illegal activity should be reported immediately to the Police on 119, and then to BirdLife Malta on 2134 7645/6 or on emergency (out of office hours) number 7925 5697, ideally with a GPS location and photos.

The 2018 trapping season was open between 20 October 2018 and 31 December 2018 (both days included).

Which birds could be trapped?

– Song Thrush (Malvizz)

– Golden Plover (Pluviera)

Finch (Linnet, Goldfinch, Greenfinch, Siskin, Hawfinch, Chaffinch and Serin) trapping is not legal anymore, following the ECJ judgement delivered last June.

National quotas were set at 5,000 Song Thrush and 700 Golden Plover. There was no individual bag limit for trapping of both species.

Each bird trapped had to be marked by placing a plastic ring around its leg (these must be the specific rings issued by the Wild Birds Regulation Unit).

It was illegal to trap any other birds.

Where and when was trapping allowed?

– From 20 October to 31 December (both days included).

– Everyday, from 2hrs before sunrise until 2hrs after sunset (trapping is not allowed during the night).

– Trapping was not allowed in protected sites (i.e. Bird Sanctuaries, designated ‘xagħri’ areas within Natura 2000 sites, Scheduled Level 1 and Level 2 Areas of Ecological Importance and Sites of Scientific Importance).

What was not allowed while trapping?

– It was illegal to use electronic callers/tape lures.

– It was illegal to have more than 10 live birds used as lures on a trapping site for Golden Plover and Song Thrush.

– It was illegal to operate the nets automatically by any means (nets must always be operated manually, by the trapper).

– It was illegal to have more than two pairs of nets in use at one time.

New measures (October 2018)

– Each license holder was allowed to register only one site with each site allowed a maximum of two nets (amount of live-capturing stations reduced from two to one per trapper).

– All trapping sites had to be registered and their coordinates were made public on the Wild Birds Regulation Unit (WBRU) website.

– Mesh size of nets were enlarged from 30mm x 30mm to a minimum of 45mm x 45mm.

– Nets had to be removed, deactivated or covered when the trapper leaves the site.

– Possession of electronic callers became illegal. If callers are discovered on a trapping site, caller will be confiscated and trapping site will be deregistered.

– Poles on a trapping site outside trapping season are now illegal.

– Any ringed birds that are captured must be reported and released.


If you witness or know about any illegal trapping it is important to first report to the Police, and then to BirdLife Malta.

Police: 119
BirdLife Malta: 2134 7645/6

If you need any extra help, download our step-by-step guide in Maltese or English on how to report illegal trapping to the police.



Trappers prepare their trapping sites by removing vegetation using mechanical cutters, burning or toxic herbicides. In many cases soil, sand or gravel is then dumped on the land to create a level surface on which nets can be laid. This practice scars the land and in fact, trapping sites can easily be seen from the air or satellite images.

A trapping site in Gozo

Many trapping sites are situated in some of the richest areas for biodiversity on the Maltese islands, including Natura 2000 sites.

Many trapping sites are also illegally built in Special Areas of Conservation, where the act of destroying protected habitat is against international law.

The destruction of habitat impacts on other species of flora and fauna, resulting in a loss of biodiversity, further impoverishing our countryside.

Apart from loss of habitat, wildlife is also harmed by nets which are often left unattended on the ground overnight, out of season, or after being abandoned. This exposes animals and birds to the risk of getting entangled in the nets and suffering a slow death of starvation or exposure.

The damage trapping can cause to the environment is one of the reasons trapping is banned in EU member states under the Birds Directive.


Trapping in Malta is mainly carried out using clap nets.  This method uses – two large nets which are placed parallel to each other on the ground and swing shut towards each other when activated. In preparation for the use of clap nets, trappers remove all vegetation in the trapping area and often dump soil or gravel to create a level surface where the nets can be spread. A number of live decoy birds are also placed around the trapping site – either kept in tiny cages or tied directly to the ground by a harness.  This type of trapping site is the one most frequently encountered in the Maltese countryside.

Another type of net used is a vertical net spread over a tall crop, such as corn, with three sides dangling to the ground and the fourth tied up like a curtain. This net is used to catch Common Quail, which seek cover in the crops after arriving in Malta at night – they are again attracted to the area by a large number of live decoys or electronic lures. In the morning the net is closed completely and a dog is pushed under the net to flush the trapped quails into a corner where they can be removed by the trapper.

Cage traps are often used to trap Turtle Dove, although they are also effective in targeting a wide range of other species.

Cage traps consist of a large central cage in which live decoy birds, food and water are kept, and separate cages into which wild birds can enter. Wild birds are attracted by the live decoys and enter the cage through small holes to join the decoys. Once the bird goes in it can’t get out.

Decoy birds are normally used by trappers to lure wild birds into a trap; however tape lures are also being illegally used. A tape lure repeating the calls of wild birds is a very effective method of attracting birds to a trapping site as it can be left to run repeatedly for all night.

Of the 7 finch species targeted by trappers, 6 have bred historically in Malta. However, as trapping became more intensive fewer of these birds continued to breed here. Today the species have either been reduced to sporadic and irregular breeders, or no longer breed at all in the Maltese islands.

Many of these species, such as the Greenfinch, Goldfinch and Common Chaffinch, are common garden birds in other European countries. Malta therefore has the dubious distinction of being the only European country that does not have a viable population of breeding finches. It isn’t only larger countries that have populations of breeding finches but also many of the central Mediterranean islands including Sicily and the much smaller islands of Lampedusa, Pantellaria and Linosa that also have breeding finch populations.

Malta, like the other central Mediterranean islands, has suitable habitat, food and water for these species to breed and raise their young. Every year, a few pairs of finches do try to breed in the Maltese islands and despite the high levels of illegal trapping some even succeed. If trapping in the Maltese islands stops, and the law is strictly enforced, Malta can have songbirds like every other country in Europe.

Finch trapping

When Malta joined the EU in 2004, a ban on finch trapping was one of the conditions of the Accession Treaty. The government agreed to gradually phase out trapping for finches over a five year period. However, in 2014 the practice was reintroduced.

The finches trapped include Greenfinch, Goldfinch, Hawfinch, Chaffinch, Serin, Linnet and Siskin.

In September 2015, the European Commission announced that they will be taking Malta to the European Court of Justice (ECJ) for allowing finch trapping, against EU law.

The court case was initiated in October 2015 and in July 2017, ECJ Advocate General Eleanor V. E. Sharpston delivered a scathing Opinion denouncing finch trapping in Malta and clearly declaring that Malta had no judicious cause to trap birds whilst questioning the level of enforcement and supervision.

Despite this, however, the Maltese Government in autumn 2017 decided once again to open the trapping season. This was the fourth finch trapping season to be opened (October 2014, October 2015, October 2016 and October 2017) despite the finch trapping derogation having continuously been an issue with the EU since the first steps taken against the country with the Letter of Formal Notice sent by the EU Commission to Malta on October 17th, 2014.

Merely a year after the ECJ Advocate General’s Opinion, in June 2018 the final judgement was delivered. It was heavily based on this Opinion.

The verdict in the case C-557/15 “European Commission vs Republic of Malta” found Malta guilty on four main counts and defeated all arguments presented by the Maltese Government, mainly:

  1. That there are no other satisfactory solutions: To the contrary, the Court ruled that Malta did not even consider any other alternatives before authorising trapping and so failed to show that there was no other satisfactory solution,
  2. That trapping is carried out in small numbers: To the contrary, the Court concluded that the numbers captured in Malta do not constitute a sustainable practice in relation to the birds that migrate over Malta from Europe,
  3. That trapping in Malta falls within the concept of ‘judicious use’ and is selective: To the contrary, the Court noted that, in view that trapping in Malta is done with massive clap-nets, it is non-selective (captures not just finches but also other fauna) and neither does it allow the control of small numbers. In view of this the Court concluded that recreational trapping of birds cannot be considered as ‘judicious use’ of wild birds,
  4. That trapping is carried out under strict enforcement: To the contrary, the Court was not convinced with the enforcement efforts carried out by the Maltese authorities in regard of the control of finches caught and the system adopted by the Wild Birds Regulation Unit (WBRU) to declare their catches. It noted that only 23% of trappers have been subject to individual checks which is inadequate and also added that evidence shows that trapping in Natura 2000 sites has been rather frequent.

Click here for a detailed timeline of the history of finch trapping in Malta.

Below are the seven types of finches which were the subject of court action initiated by the European Commission against Malta at the European Court of Justice (Click on each picture to enlarge).

Siskin (Ekru)

Goldfinch (Gardell)

European Serin (Apparell)

Linnet (Ġojjin)

Greenfinch (Verdun)

Common Chaffinch (Sponsun)

Hawfinch (Taż-Żebbuġ)

ECJ judgement

On 21st June 2018, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) delivered a judgement concluding that Malta was found guilty of infringing the European Birds Directive when it allowed finch trapping to reopen in 2014. The ECJ clearly stated that by adopting a derogation allowing the trapping of seven species of wild finch, Malta has failed to fulfill its obligations under EU law.

BirdLife Malta insisted that in the light of this judgement, the Government should never open the trapping season for finches again and should repeal the relevant framework law with immediate effect. You can read more here.

Delivered by the European Court of Justice as the final stage of the infringement case initiated by the European Commission against Malta in 2015, the verdict follows the Opinion delivered in July 2017 by ECJ Advocate General Eleanor V. E. Sharpston in regard to the same Infringement Proceedings which on 24th September 2015 resulted in Malta being referred to the Court of Justice of the EU.

In preparation for this landmark ECJ judgement, in January 2018 BirdLife Malta had launched the campaign #STOPTRAPPINGNOW with the objective of explaining more about trapping to the general public and raising awareness about the several impacts of finch trapping on the birds, their habitat and the Maltese environment in general.

Click here for the campaign leaflet we prepared to explain more about finch trapping in Malta and the several impacts on the birds, their habitat and the Maltese environment.

Click here for a detailed dossier which contains details about the situation in regard to finch trapping in Malta and how this is damaging to our country, together with a timeline in relation to the European Court of Justice (ECJ) case.